1950 Buick 40 vs. 1972 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 1972 Dodge Challenger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 5,562 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Dodge Challenger (241 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1972 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Dodge Challenger (401 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Buick 40. (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1972 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 1972 Dodge Challenger | |
Make | Buick | Dodge |
Model | 40 | Challenger |
Year Released | 1950 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 5562 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 241 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 401 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 102.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 84.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1405 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2810 mm |