1950 Buick 40 vs. 1972 Holden Torana
To start off, 1972 Holden Torana is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1972 Holden Torana. (62 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1972 Holden Torana. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 785 kg more than 1972 Holden Torana. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Holden Torana. (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Holden Torana.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 1972 Holden Torana | |
Make | Buick | Holden |
Model | 40 | Torana |
Year Released | 1950 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 1256 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2440 mm |