1950 Buick 40 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Buick 40 (114 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 720 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Buick | Fiat |
Model | 40 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 285 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 104.8 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2450 mm |