1950 Buick 40 vs. 1986 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1986 Mercury Sable is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 240 kg more than 1986 Mercury Sable.
Because 1950 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Mercury Sable, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 1986 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Buick | Mercury |
Model | 40 | Sable |
Year Released | 1950 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 2513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2700 mm |