1950 Buick 40 vs. 2001 Mercury Villager

To start off, 2001 Mercury Villager is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Villager (168 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Villager weights approximately 145 kg more than 1950 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1950 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercury Villager. (271 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercury Villager.

Compare all specifications: