1950 Buick 40 vs. 2002 Maserati Coupe
To start off, 2002 Maserati Coupe is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,244 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Maserati Coupe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Maserati Coupe (390 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Maserati Coupe should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Maserati Coupe weights approximately 35 kg more than 1950 Buick 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Maserati Coupe (451 Nm) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Buick 40. (285 Nm). This means 2002 Maserati Coupe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Buick 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Buick 40 | 2002 Maserati Coupe | |
| Make | Buick | Maserati |
| Model | 40 | Coupe |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4065 cc | 4244 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 285 Nm | 451 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1675 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2670 mm |
