1950 Buick 40 vs. 2003 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 2003 Mahindra Armada is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Buick 40 (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra Armada. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 364 kg more than 1950 Buick 40.
Because 2003 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Buick 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Buick 40 | 2003 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Buick | Mahindra |
| Model | 40 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4065 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 2004 kg |
