1950 Buick 40 vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 511 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda Tribute. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | 40 | Tribute |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 2260 cc |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 285 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1640 kg | 1129 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2630 mm |