1950 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Buick 40 (114 HP) has 47 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1950 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1950 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Buick 40 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | 40 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4065 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3090 mm | 2490 mm |