1950 Buick 40 vs. 2009 Mazda 3

To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,065 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (154 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1950 Buick 40. (114 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1950 Buick 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Buick 40 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.

Because 1950 Buick 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1950 Buick 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1950 Buick 40 (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (204 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1950 Buick 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.

Compare all specifications:

1950 Buick 40 2009 Mazda 3
Make Buick Mazda
Model 40 3
Year Released 1950 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4065 cc 2260 cc
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 114 HP 154 HP
Engine RPM 3600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 285 Nm 204 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 78.5 mm 87.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 104.8 mm 94 mm
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1640 kg 1125 kg
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1760 mm
Wheelbase Size 3090 mm 2650 mm