1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 1964 DKW Munga
To start off, 1964 DKW Munga is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 642 kg more than 1964 DKW Munga.
Because 1964 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 1964 DKW Munga | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | 62 | Munga |
Year Released | 1950 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2010 mm |