1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 1994 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 363 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 1994 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 1994 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1950 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 134 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2750 mm |