1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Ford F-250
To start off, 1997 Ford F-250 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Ford F-250 weights approximately 628 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 1997 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Ford F-250 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | F-250 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 6800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 306 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2380 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3490 mm |
