1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12
To start off, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | T V-12 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 7255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 582 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2302 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2810 mm |