1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,670 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 564 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2000 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2570 mm |