1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 153 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2001 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | 62 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1950 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1905 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2550 mm |