1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,441 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL weights approximately 123 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | SL |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 494 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2570 mm |