1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,439 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 548 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1950 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 286 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2300 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2720 mm |