1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Cadillac 62 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Cadillac | Holden |
| Model | 62 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
