1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Lincoln MKS
To start off, 2009 Lincoln MKS is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Lincoln MKS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lincoln MKS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Lincoln MKS | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | 62 | MKS |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 3724 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2870 mm |