1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Maybach 57
To start off, 2009 Maybach 57 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (12 cylinders), 2009 Maybach 57 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Maybach 57 weights approximately 983 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Maybach 57 | |
Make | Cadillac | Maybach |
Model | 62 | 57 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 5979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 604 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2735 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 3400 mm |