1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2010 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 108 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 2010 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 62 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5425 cc | 3800 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 205 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1877 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2946 mm |
