1950 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,425 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo X670 weights approximately 176 kg more than 1950 Cadillac 62.
Because 2013 Volvo X670 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | X670 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5425 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1928 kg |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2815 mm |