1950 Chrysler Windsor vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Chrysler Windsor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Chrysler Windsor would be higher. At 4,920 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Chrysler Windsor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1950 Chrysler Windsor. (187 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1950 Chrysler Windsor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 592 kg more than 1950 Chrysler Windsor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Chrysler Windsor. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Chrysler Windsor | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
| Model | Windsor | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4920 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 187 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1850 kg | 2442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5560 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2890 mm |
