1950 Citroen 11 vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 1968 Ford Fairlane is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 115 kg more than 1950 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Citroen 11 | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 11 | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2782 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 81 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1310 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2960 mm |
