1950 Citroen 11 vs. 1980 Toyota Cressida
To start off, 1980 Toyota Cressida is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 2,187 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Toyota Cressida is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Cressida (66 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Cressida should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Cressida weights approximately 65 kg more than 1950 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Toyota Cressida is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Toyota Cressida. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Citroen 11 | 1980 Toyota Cressida | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | 11 | Cressida |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1911 cc | 2187 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2650 mm |
