1950 Citroen 11 vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2013 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo S60 weights approximately 418 kg more than 1950 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Volvo S60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Citroen 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Citroen 11 | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 11 | S60 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2776 mm |