1950 Citroen 11 vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 942 kg more than 1950 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Citroen 11 | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 11 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1911 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 3200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2137 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4807 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1936 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2857 mm |