1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 1943 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 1950 Citroen 2CV is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Because 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1943 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Citroen 2CV | 1943 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | PV 801-10 |
Year Released | 1950 | 1943 |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3260 mm |