1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 Lada Tarzan

To start off, 2000 Lada Tarzan is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,499 cc, 2000 Lada Tarzan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lada Tarzan (77 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lada Tarzan weights approximately 547 kg more than 1950 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2000 Lada Tarzan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lada Tarzan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lada Tarzan (117 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2000 Lada Tarzan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Citroen 2CV. 2000 Lada Tarzan has automatic transmission and 1950 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1950 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Lada Tarzan will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: