1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 791 kg more than 1950 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Seat Arosa (117 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm). This means 2000 Seat Arosa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Citroen 2CV | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Citroen | Seat |
| Model | 2CV | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 22 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 498 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2850 mm |
