1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2003 Ford Ranger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Ranger weights approximately 1222 kg more than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2003 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 498 kg | 1720 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3010 mm |
