1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Isuzu I-350
To start off, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,458 cc, 2006 Isuzu I-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Because 2006 Isuzu I-350 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1950 Citroen 2CV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Isuzu I-350 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Isuzu I-350 (305 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 283 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Isuzu I-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Isuzu I-350 | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | 2CV | I-350 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 3458 cc |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 305 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 74 L |