1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,388 cc (3 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (122 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (22 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1950 Citroen 2CV | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Citroen | Volkswagen |
Model | 2CV | Polo |
Year Released | 1950 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 375 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 10 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 22 Nm | 122 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 75.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 76.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 45 L |