1950 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 58 more horse power than 1950 Citroen 2CV. (10 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1950 Citroen 2CV.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | 2CV | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 375 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 10 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2360 mm |
