1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1952 Ford 12 M is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,172 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Ford 12 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Ford 12 M (37 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Ford 12 M should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | 12 M |
Year Released | 1950 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2500 mm |