1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 1952 Riley RM A is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 375 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
| Make | DKW | Riley |
| Model | F 89 | RM A |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2870 mm |
