1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1962 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1962 Toyota Corona is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Toyota Corona (38 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Toyota Corona weights approximately 30 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 1962 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | F 89 | Corona |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1500 mm |
