1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1963 Lotus Elan is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 DKW F 89 weights approximately 316 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | F 89 | Elan |
Year Released | 1950 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |