1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1965 Riley Kestrel is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,098 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Riley Kestrel (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Riley Kestrel weights approximately 25 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | DKW | Riley |
| Model | F 89 | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2380 mm |
