1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1968 Holden Belmont

To start off, 1968 Holden Belmont is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Belmont is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Belmont (181 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Belmont should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Holden Belmont weights approximately 390 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Holden Belmont is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Belmont. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1968 Holden Belmont has automatic transmission and 1950 DKW F 89 has manual transmission. 1950 DKW F 89 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1968 Holden Belmont will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: