1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1976 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,292 cc, 1976 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 1976 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | F 89 | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1950 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 2292 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2480 mm |
