1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1981 Seat Ritmo is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 22 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | DKW | Seat |
Model | F 89 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1950 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 882 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2460 mm |