1950 DKW F 89 vs. 1996 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1996 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,797 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Mustang (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Ford Mustang weights approximately 530 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 1996 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1950 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 3797 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |