1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2000 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2000 Ford Falcon is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 4,940 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Falcon (270 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Falcon weights approximately 415 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2000 Ford Falcon | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 89 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 4940 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2800 mm |