1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2000 MCC ForTwo
To start off, 2000 MCC ForTwo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 684 cc (2 cylinders), 1950 DKW F 89 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 MCC ForTwo (44 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 MCC ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 DKW F 89 weights approximately 180 kg more than 2000 MCC ForTwo.
Because 2000 MCC ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 MCC ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 2000 MCC ForTwo | |
| Make | DKW | MCC |
| Model | F 89 | ForTwo |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 680 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 1810 mm |
