1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2002 Dodge Razor
To start off, 2002 Dodge Razor is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Razor is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Razor (251 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Razor should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Razor weights approximately 275 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Dodge Razor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Dodge Razor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2002 Dodge Razor | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | F 89 | Razor |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1135 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2500 mm |