1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2002 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (385 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 361 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 750 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1950 DKW F 89 | 2002 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 89 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 684 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 385 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1660 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
