1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2002 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Toyota Celica is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 1,832 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Celica (129 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Celica weights approximately 280 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2002 Toyota Celica | |
Make | DKW | Toyota |
Model | F 89 | Celica |
Year Released | 1950 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 1832 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2800 mm |