1950 DKW F 89 vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 2,522 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo C70 (197 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1950 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 1950 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo C70 weights approximately 705 kg more than 1950 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1950 DKW F 89 | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | F 89 | C70 |
Year Released | 1950 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 684 cc | 2522 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2860 mm |